Guardianship should be

• A. The most intrusive option available
• B. An optional safeguard only for financial matters
• C. The least intrusive but necessary to protect the individual
• D. A voluntary arrangement with no court involvement

Answer: (C)

Guardianship should be used only to the extent necessary to protect a person who cannot make or communicate essential personal or financial decisions. It is a protective measure that must be court-supervised, with the guardian’s powers limited to what is needed and subject to ongoing review. The aim is to preserve the person’s autonomy as much as possible, using the least restrictive option that still provides protection. If there are less intrusive alternatives available—such as supported decision-making or a powers of attorney—those should be explored first. Guardianship is not the most intrusive option, not limited to finances alone, and not something entered into voluntarily without court involvement.